Rule
14-533. Diversion.
(a) Referral to diversion. In a matter
involving less serious misconduct as outlined in subsection (c), upon receipt
of an informal complaint and before filing a formal complaint, the respondent
may have the option of electing to have the matter referred to diversion, the
appropriateness of which will be determined by the chair of the Diversion
Committee after consultation with OPC. The option for diversion also may be
initiated by OPC or the Ethics and Discipline Committee screening panel.
Diversion may require the participation of the respondent in one or more of the
following:
(a)(1) fee
arbitration;
(a)(2) mediation;
(a)(3) law office
management assistance;
(a)(4) lawyer
assistance programs;
(a)(5) psychological
and behavioral counseling;
(a)(6) monitoring;
(a)(7) restitution;
(a)(8) continuing
legal education programs including, but not limited to, ethics school; or
(a)(9) any other
program or corrective course of action to address the respondent’s conduct.
(b) Diversion Committee.
(b)(1) Composition. Members of the Diversion
Committee shall be appointed by the Supreme Court. The committee shall consist
of five members, four of whom shall be members of the Bar who have demonstrated
a high standard of professional conduct, preferably with at least one Bar member having past experience on the Supreme Court
Ethics and Discipline Committee, and one public member with professional
training in the area of substance abuse and/or stress management. Upon initial
appointment, committee members, other than the chair,
shall draw by lot for terms of office of two and three years. All appointments
thereafter shall be for three-year terms. Committee members shall not serve
more than two consecutive terms. The Supreme Court shall designate one of the
Bar members as committee chair for a term of three years.
(b)(2) Authority and responsibility. The
Diversion Committee may negotiate and execute diversion contracts, assign
monitoring to a lawyers assistance program, determine compliance with the terms
of diversion contracts, and determine fulfillment or any material breach of
diversion contracts, subject to review under subsection (j)(3)
of this rule, and adopt such policies and procedures as may be appropriate to
accomplish its duties under this rule. The Diversion Committee shall have
authority to establish subcommittees of volunteer attorneys and other
professionals for the specific purpose of monitoring the compliance of any
attorney under diversion and reporting compliance to OPC and the Diversion Committee
on a regular basis.
(c) Less serious misconduct. Conduct which
would result in a suspension or disbarment is not considered to be less serious
misconduct. Conduct is not ordinarily considered less serious misconduct if any
of the following considerations apply:
(c)(1) the
misconduct involves the misappropriation of client funds;
(c)(2) the
misconduct results in or is likely to result in substantial prejudice to a
client or other person, absent adequate provisions for restitution;
(c)(3) the respondent
has been sanctioned in the last three years;
(c)(4) the
misconduct is of the same nature as misconduct for which the respondent has
been sanctioned in the last three years;
(c)(5) the
misconduct involves dishonesty, deceit, fraud, or misrepresentation;
(c)(6) the
misconduct constitutes a substantial threat of irreparable harm to the public;
a felony; or a misdemeanor which reflects adversely on the respondent’s
honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer; or
(c)(7) the
misconduct is part of a pattern of similar misconduct.
(d) Factors for consideration. The Diversion
Committee considers the following factors in negotiating and executing the
diversion contract:
(d)(1) whether the
presumptive sanction that would be imposed, in the opinion of OPC or the
Diversion Committee is likely to be no more severe than a public reprimand or
private admonition;
(d)(2) whether
participation in diversion is likely to improve the respondent’s future
professional conduct and accomplish the goals of lawyer discipline;
(d)(3) whether
aggravating or mitigating factors exist; and
(d)(4) whether
diversion was already tried.
(e) Notice to complainant. The OPC will
notify the complainant, if any, of the proposed decision to refer the
respondent to diversion, and the complainant may submit written comments. The
complainant will be notified when the complaint is diverted and when the
complaint is dismissed. All notices will be sent to the complainant’s address
of record on file with the OPC. Such decision to divert or dismiss is not
appealable.
(f) Diversion contract.
(f)(1) If the respondent agrees or elects to
participate in diversion as provided by this rule, the terms of the diversion
shall be set forth in a written contract. If the contract is entered prior to a
hearing of a screening panel of the Ethics and Discipline Committee pursuant to
Rule 14-510(b), the contract shall be between the respondent and OPC. If
diversion is agreed to and entered after a screening panel of the Ethics and
Discipline Committee has convened pursuant to Rule 14-510(b), the contract
shall be made as part of the decision of that screening panel. If diversion is
agreed to and entered after a complaint has been filed pursuant to Rule 14-512,
the diversion contract shall be made as part of the ruling and order of the
Court. Except as otherwise part of an order of a court, the Diversion Committee
shall monitor and supervise the conditions of diversion and the terms of the
diversion contract. The contract shall specify the program(s) to which the
attorney shall be diverted, the general purpose of the diversion, the manner in
which compliance is to be monitored, and any requirement for payment of
restitution or cost. The respondent attorney shall bear the burden of drafting
and submitting the proposed diversion contract. Respondent may utilize counsel
to assist in the negotiation phase of diversion. Respondent may also utilize Bar benefits programs provided by the Bar, such as a lawyer
assistance program to assist in developing terms and conditions for the diversion
contract appropriate to that respondent’s particular situation. Use of a lawyers assistance program to assess appropriate conditions
for diversion shall not conflict that entity from providing services under the
contract. The terms of each contract shall be specifically tailored to the
respondent’s individual circumstances. The contract is confidential and its
terms shall not be disclosed to other than the parties to the contract.
(f)(2) All diversion contracts must contain
at least all the following:
(f)(2)(A) the
signatures of respondent, his counsel if any, and the chair of the Diversion
Committee;
(f)(2)(B) the terms and conditions of the
plan for respondent and, the identity, if appropriate, of any service provider,
mentor, monitor and/or supervisor and that individual’s specific
responsibilities. If a professional or service is utilized, and it is necessary
to disclose confidential information, respondent must sign a limited
conditional waiver of confidentiality permitting the professional or service to
make the necessary disclosures in order for the respondent to fulfill his
duties under the contract;
(f)(2)(C) the necessary terms providing for
oversight of fulfillment of the contract terms, including provisions for those
involved to report any alleged breach of the contract to OPC;
(f)(2)(D) the necessary terms providing that
respondent will pay all costs incurred in connection with the contract and
those costs further specified pursuant to subsection (k) and any costs
associated with the complaints to be deferred; and
(f)(2)(E) a
specific acknowledgement that a material violation of a contract term renders
the respondent’s participation in diversion voidable by the chair of the
Diversion Committee or his designee;
(f)(3) The contract may be amended on
subsequent agreement of respondent and OPC.
(f)(4) The chair of the Ethics and
Discipline Committee and OPC shall be given copies of every diversion contract
entered and signed by the respondent and the Diversion Committee chair.
(g) Affidavit supporting diversion. A
diversion contract must be supported by the respondent’s or the respondent’s
lawyer’s affidavit or declaration as approved by the Diversion Committee
setting forth the purpose for diversion and how the specific terms of the
diversion contract will address the allegations raised by the complaint. The
respondent is not required to admit to the allegations in the complaint upon
entering diversion. However, an admission and/or acknowledgement may be
relevant and necessary as part of treatment in diversion. Such an admission
shall be confidential for treatment purposes, shall not be released to any
third party, and shall not be treated as an admission
against interest nor used for future prosecution should diversion fail.
(h) Status of complaint. After a diversion
contract is executed by the respondent, the disciplinary complaint is deferred
pending successful completion of the contract.
(i) Effect of
non-participation in diversion. The respondent has the right to decline to
participate in diversion. If the respondent chooses not to participate in
diversion, the matter proceeds pursuant to the Rules of Lawyer Discipline and
Disability.
(j) Termination of diversion.
(j)(1) Fulfillment of the contract. The
contract terminates when the respondent has fulfilled the terms of the contract
and gives the Diversion Committee and OPC an affidavit or declaration
demonstrating fulfillment. Upon receipt of this affidavit or declaration, the
Diversion Committee and OPC must acknowledge receipt and request that the chair
of the Ethics and Discipline Committee or his designee dismiss any complaint(s)
deferred pending successful completion of the contract or notify the respondent
that fulfillment of the contract is disputed based on an OPC claim of material
breach. The complainant cannot appeal the dismissal. Successful completion of
the contract is a bar to any further disciplinary proceedings based on the same
allegations and successful completion of diversion shall not constitute a form
of discipline.
(j)(2) Material breach. A material breach of
the contract is cause for termination of the contract. After a material breach,
OPC must notify the respondent of the alleged breach and intent to terminate
the diversion. Thereafter, disciplinary proceedings may be instituted, resumed
or reinstated.
(j)(3) Review by the chair. The Diversion
Committee may review disputes regarding the alleged material breach of any term
of the contract on the request of the respondent or OPC. The request must be
filed with the Diversion Committee chair within 15 days of notice to the
respondent of the determination for which review is sought. The respondent is
entitled to a hearing before the Diversion Committee on any alleged breach to
the diversion contract. Determinations under this section are not subject to
further review and are not reviewable in any proceeding.
(k) Costs. Upon entering diversion,
respondent shall pay an initial fee of $250. During diversion, respondent shall
pay a fee of $50 per month. All such fees are payable to the Bar’s general
fund. These fees may be waived upon a hardship request, the validity or
appropriateness of which shall be determined by the chair of the Diversion
Committee or his designee.