Rule 14-533. Diversion.
(a) Referral to
diversion. In a matter involving less serious misconduct as outlined in
subsection (c), upon receipt of an informal complaint and before filing a
formal complaint, the respondent may have the option of electing to have the
matter referred to diversion, the appropriateness of which will be determined
by the chair of the Diversion Committee after consultation with OPC. The option for diversion also may be initiated by OPC or the Ethics and Discipline Committee screening panel.
Diversion may require the participation of the respondent in one or more of the
following:
(a)(1) fee
arbitration;
(a)(2) mediation;
(a)(3) law office
management assistance;
(a)(4) lawyer
assistance programs;
(a)(5) psychological
and behavioral counseling;
(a)(6) monitoring;
(a)(7) restitution;
(a)(8) continuing
legal education programs including, but not limited to, ethics school; or
(a)(9) any other
program or corrective course of action to address the respondent’s conduct.
(b) Diversion Committee.
(b)(1) Composition.
Members of the Diversion Committee shall be appointed by the Supreme Court. The
committee shall consist of five members, four of whom shall be members of the
Bar who have demonstrated a high standard of professional conduct, preferably
with at least one Bar member having past experience on the Supreme Court Ethics
and Discipline Committee, and one public member with professional training in
the area of substance abuse and/or stress management. Upon initial appointment,
committee members, other than the chair, shall draw by lot for terms of office
of two and three years. All appointments thereafter shall be for three-year
terms. Committee members shall not serve more than two consecutive terms. The
Supreme Court shall designate one of the Bar members as committee chair for a
term of three years.
(b)(2) Authority and
responsibility. The Diversion Committee may negotiate and execute diversion
contracts, assign monitoring to a lawyers assistance program, determine
compliance with the terms of diversion contracts, and determine fulfillment or
any material breach of diversion contracts, subject to review under subsection
(j)(3) of this rule, and adopt such policies and procedures as may be
appropriate to accomplish its duties under this rule. The Diversion Committee
shall have authority to establish subcommittees of volunteer attorneys and
other professionals for the specific purpose of monitoring the compliance of
any attorney under diversion and reporting compliance to OPC
and the Diversion Committee on a regular basis.
(c) Less serious
misconduct. Conduct which would result in a suspension or disbarment is not
considered to be less serious misconduct. Conduct is not ordinarily considered
less serious misconduct if any of the following considerations apply:
(c)(1) the misconduct
involves the misappropriation of client funds;
(c)(2) the misconduct
results in or is likely to result in substantial prejudice to a client or other
person, absent adequate provisions for restitution;
(c)(3) the respondent
has been sanctioned in the last three years;
(c)(4) the misconduct
is of the same nature as misconduct for which the respondent has been
sanctioned in the last three years;
(c)(5) the misconduct
involves dishonesty, deceit, fraud, or misrepresentation;
(c)(6) the misconduct
constitutes a substantial threat of irreparable harm to the public; a felony;
or a misdemeanor which reflects adversely on the respondent’s honesty,
trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer; or
(c)(7) the misconduct
is part of a pattern of similar misconduct.
(d) Factors for
consideration. The Diversion Committee considers the following factors in
negotiating and executing the diversion contract:
(d)(1) whether the
presumptive sanction that would be imposed, in the opinion of OPC or the Diversion Committee is likely to be no more
severe than a public reprimand or private admonition;
(d)(2) whether
participation in diversion is likely to improve the respondent’s future
professional conduct and accomplish the goals of lawyer discipline;
(d)(3) whether
aggravating or mitigating factors exist; and
(d)(4) whether
diversion was already tried.
(e) Notice to
complainant. The OPC will notify the complainant, if
any, of the proposed decision to refer the respondent to diversion, and the
complainant may submit written comments. The complainant will be notified when
the complaint is diverted and when the complaint is dismissed. All notices will
be sent to the complainant’s address of record on file with the OPC. Such decision to divert or dismiss is not appealable.
(f) Diversion
contract.
(f)(1) If the
respondent agrees or elects to participate in diversion as provided by this
rule, the terms of the diversion shall be set forth in a written contract. If
the contract is entered prior to a hearing of a screening panel of the Ethics
and Discipline Committee pursuant to Rule 14-510(b), the contract shall be
between the respondent and OPC. If diversion is
agreed to and entered after a screening panel of the Ethics and Discipline
Committee has convened pursuant to Rule 14-510(b), the contract shall be made
as part of the decision of that screening panel. As secretary to the screening
panel, OPC will memorialize the contract and
decision. If diversion is agreed to and
entered after a complaint has been filed pursuant to Rule 14-512, the diversion
contract shall be made as part of the ruling and order of the Court. Except as
otherwise part of an order of a court, the Diversion Committee shall monitor
and supervise the conditions of diversion and the terms of the diversion
contract. The contract shall specify the program(s) to which the attorney shall
be diverted, the general purpose of the diversion, the manner in which
compliance is to be monitored, and any requirement for payment of restitution
or cost. The respondent attorney shall bear the burden of drafting and
submitting the proposed diversion contract. Respondent may utilize counsel to
assist in the negotiation phase of diversion. Respondent may also utilize Bar
benefits programs provided by the Bar, such as a lawyer assistance program to
assist in developing terms and conditions for the diversion contract
appropriate to that respondent’s particular situation. Use of a lawyers
assistance program to assess appropriate conditions for diversion shall not
conflict that entity from providing services under the contract. The terms of
each contract shall be specifically tailored to the respondent’s individual
circumstances. The contract is confidential and its terms shall not be
disclosed to other than the parties to the contract.
(f)(2) All diversion
contracts must contain at least all the following:
(f)(2)(A) the
signatures of respondent, his counsel if any, and the chair of the Diversion
Committee;
(f)(2)(B) the terms
and conditions of the plan for respondent and, the identity, if appropriate, of
any service provider, mentor, monitor and/or supervisor and that individual’s
specific responsibilities. If a professional or service is utilized, and it is
necessary to disclose confidential information, respondent must sign a limited
conditional waiver of confidentiality permitting the professional or service to
make the necessary disclosures in order for the respondent to fulfill his
duties under the contract;
(f)(2)(C) the
necessary terms providing for oversight of fulfillment of the contract terms,
including provisions for those involved to report any alleged breach of the
contract to OPC;
(f)(2)(D) the
necessary terms providing that respondent will pay all costs incurred in
connection with the contract and those costs further specified pursuant to
subsection (k) and any costs associated with the complaints to be deferred; and
(f)(2)(E) a specific
acknowledgement that a material violation of a contract term renders the
respondent’s participation in diversion voidable by the chair of the Diversion
Committee or his designee;
(f)(3) The contract
may be amended on subsequent agreement of respondent and OPC.
(f)(4) The chair of
the Ethics and Discipline Committee and OPC shall be
given copies of every diversion contract entered and signed by the respondent
and the Diversion Committee chair.
(g) Affidavit
supporting diversion. A diversion contract must be supported by the
respondent’s or the respondent’s lawyer’s affidavit or declaration as approved
by the Diversion Committee setting forth the purpose for diversion and how the
specific terms of the diversion contract will address the allegations raised by
the complaint. The respondent is not required to admit to the allegations in
the complaint upon entering diversion. However, an admission and/or
acknowledgement may be relevant and necessary as part of treatment in
diversion. Such an admission shall be confidential for treatment purposes,
shall not be released to any third party, and shall not be treated as an
admission against interest nor used for future prosecution should diversion
fail.
(h) Status of
complaint. After a diversion contract is executed by the respondent, the
disciplinary complaint is deferred pending successful completion of the
contract.
(i)
Effect of non-participation in diversion. The respondent has the right to
decline to participate in diversion. If the respondent chooses not to
participate in diversion, the matter proceeds pursuant to the Rules of Lawyer
Discipline and Disability.
(j) Termination of
diversion.
(j)(1) Fulfillment of
the contract. The contract terminates when the respondent has fulfilled the
terms of the contract and gives the Diversion Committee and OPC
an affidavit or declaration demonstrating fulfillment. Upon receipt of this
affidavit or declaration, the Diversion Committee and OPC
must acknowledge receipt and request that the chair of the Ethics and
Discipline Committee or his designee dismiss any complaint(s) deferred pending
successful completion of the contract or notify the respondent that fulfillment
of the contract is disputed based on an OPC claim of
material breach. The complainant cannot appeal the dismissal. Successful
completion of the contract is a bar to any further disciplinary proceedings
based on the same allegations and successful completion of diversion shall not
constitute a form of discipline.
(j)(2) Material
breach. A material breach of the contract is cause for termination of the
contract. After a material breach, OPC must notify
the respondent of the alleged breach and intent to terminate the diversion. Thereafter,
disciplinary proceedings may be instituted, resumed or reinstated.
(j)(3) Review by the
chair. The Diversion Committee may review disputes regarding the alleged
material breach of any term of the contract on the request of the respondent or
OPC. The request must be filed with the Diversion
Committee chair within 15 days of notice to the respondent of the determination
for which review is sought. The respondent is entitled to a hearing before the
Diversion Committee on any alleged breach to the diversion contract.
Determinations under this section are not subject to further review and are not
reviewable in any proceeding.
(k) Costs. Upon
entering diversion, respondent shall pay an initial fee of $250. During
diversion, respondent shall pay a fee of $50 per month. All such fees are
payable to the Bar’s general fund. These fees may be waived upon a hardship
request, the validity or appropriateness of which shall be determined by the
chair of the Diversion Committee or his designee.