The Ethics Advisory Committee has been asked for its opinion on the question or whether the Code of Conduct permits a Justice of the Peace to serve as a member of a local Youth Coordinating Council (YCC). It is the committee's opinion that the answer is yes, unless the Justice of the Peace is involved in fund-raising for the organization or permits the use of the judicial office for that purpose. The purpose of the YCC is to help young people refrain from the use of drugs and alcohol. Financing for the group is provided by a federal grant. The Justice of the Peace would like to serve as a member of the group but does not intend to hold office.
Justices of the Peace are considered "part-time judges" as defined by Utah's Code of Judicial Conduct. Such judges are not required to comply with Canons 4B, 5D, 5E and 5F of the Code but are required to comply with the remaining provisions.
Canon 5 of the Code of Judicial Conduct provides: "A judge should regulate extra-judicial activities to minimize the risk of conflict with judicial duties." Canon 5B further states:
(2) A judge should not solicit funds for any . . . .charitable . . . or civic organization, or use or permit the use of the prestige of the judicial office for that purpose, but may be listed as an officer, director, or trustee of such an organization. A judge should not be the speaker or the guest of honor at an organization's fund-raising events, but may attend such events. A judge should be especially sensitive to the potential conflicts which may result from serving in positions of responsibility in such organizations while carrying out judicial duties and limit the judge's duties in the area of solicitation of funds for the organization
Finally, because the YCC is funded by a federal grant, there is no indication that the judge would be involved in fund-raising efforts. Accordingly, there is no apparent conflict with Canon 5B(2). This committee has previously quoted favorably from the ABA Commentary to Canon 5 acknowledging that [c]omplete separation of a judge from extra-judicial activities is neither possible nor wise; he should not become isolated from the society in which he lives." Informal Opinion No. 88-4. Due, however, to the changing nature of organizations, the ABA Commentary to 5B recommends that a judge regularly reexamine the activities of the organizations with which he is affiliated to determine if it is proper for him to continue his relationship with it.
The Federal Advisory Committee on Judicial Activities has considered
this issue in several advisory opinions. The Committee has concluded that
a judge is permitted to serve on the Board of Directors of such groups
as the Salvation Army, or the Red Cross. Advisory Opinion No. 2: on the
managing board of a religious, fraternal or charitable corporation. Advisory
Opinion No. 12. and on the board of a hospital. Advisory Opinion No. 28.
Service in these positions is permitted as long as the judge's charitable
and civic work does not interfere with the performance of his/her judicial
duties: and as long as he/she did not engage in the solicitation of funds
or permit the use of his/her name or office for that purpose. In this particular
instance, the committee recommends that the justice continually reassess
his position on the committee to ensure that the policies and objectives
of the committee do not interfere with the justice's ability to give impartial
consideration to those cases before him which involve trafficking in or
use of alcohol and drugs. If the justice senses a public expectation of
a particular disposition in these cases because of his committee involvement.
such an expectation may interfere with the proper exercise of his judicial
duties and require his resignation from the committee. In conclusion, it
is the committee's opinion that as long as the Justice's membership on
the YCC will not involve fund-raising or interfere with the performance
of his judicial duties. and where the organization is not likely to be
engaged in proceedings which ordinarily come before the judge, membership
in the organization does not violate the Code of Judicial Conduct.